Main Logo
Logo

Society for Pediatric Radiology – Poster Archive

  152
  0
  0
 
 


Final ID: Paper #: 081

Cost Comparison of Upper GI versus Ultrasound for Pediatric Patients with Suspected Midgut Volvulus

Purpose or Case Report: While a definitive conclusion regarding the optimal diagnostic strategy for midgut volvulus remains elusive, value can also be derived from cost. The purpose is to quantify and compare the monetary and time costs, from a provider perspective of imaging with Upper GI (UGI) versus Ultrasound (US) of children with suspected midgut volvulus.
Methods & Materials: Process maps were created by direct patient shadowing, electronic medical record review and interviews with front-line staff. Using the time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) methodology, practical capacity cost rates were calculated for personnel, equipment, and facility costs. The cost of each process step was determined by multiplying the step-specific capacity costs by the median time required to complete each step. Base case total pathway costs for UGI and US were computed by summing the costs of all steps through each process pathway. Multivariate sensitivity analysis was performed applying all minimum and maximum labor costs. Costs across the modality pathways were then compared.
Results: Base case process maps demonstrated an average time of 77 minutes for the UGI pathway and 53 minutes for the US pathway. UGI pathway time varied based on whether the patient was able to consume contrast or if a nasogastric tube (NG) tube was required. Total pathway time for patients’ undergoing evaluation with UGI was on average 23 minutes longer than those undergoing evaluation with US.

Total base case cost for an UGI evaluation was $223.80 when the procedure was performed by a radiology assistant (RA) and $343.06 when the procedure was performed by a radiologist. Multivariate sensitivity analyses for UGI evaluation applying all minimum and maximum labor cost variables revealed a total range of $198.74 (minimum) to $256.65 (maximum) when the procedure was conducted by an RA and $304.32 (minimum) to $389.58 (maximum) when conducted by a radiologist.

Total base case cost for US evaluation was $149.60 when the procedure was performed by a sonographer and $210.23 when the procedure was performed by a radiologist. Multivariate sensitivity analyses for US evaluation applying all minimum and maximum labor cost variables revealed a total range of $129.36 (minimum) to $181.48 (maximum) when performed by a sonographer and $186.42 (minimum) to $243.49 (maximum) when performed by a radiologist.
Conclusions: Ultrasound is a more efficient and less costly alternative compared to UGI in patients with suspected midgut volvulus.
Session Info:

Scientific Session III-C: Healthcare Policy/QI

Informatics, Education, QI, or Healthcare Policy

SPR Scientific Papers

More abstracts on this topic:
Pediatric Colonic Volvulus--The Role of CT in Diagnosis and Definitive Management

Hendi Aditi, Harty Mary, Grissom Leslie

Twists and Turns of Upper Abdominal Solid Viscera

Sundaram Karthik, Singh Sudha, Hernanz-schulman Marta

Due to circumstances surrounding the coronavirus pandemic, this final ePoster exhibit was not submitted.
You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.

Not Available

Comments

We encourage you to join the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and stimulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

Please click here to review the full terms and conditions for engaging in the discussion, including refraining from product promotion and non-constructive feedback.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)