Main Logo
Logo

Society for Pediatric Radiology – Poster Archive

  159
  0
  0
 
 


Final ID: Paper #: 087

Clinical Decision Support has no Effect on Payer Claim Denials

Purpose or Case Report: At our children’s hospital, we deployed clinical decision support (CDS) software to support appropriate use of imaging. The software is primarily based on ACR appropriateness criteria. To determine if by using CDS, lower rates of payer claim denials could be expected, we evaluated rates of payer claim denials based on CDS score prior to CDS go-live.
Methods & Materials: This study was HIPAA compliant and exempt from IRB approval. The specified indications on all CT exams performed 9/18/18 to 6/30/19 were rated by ACR-CDS software in silent mode; no feedback was presented to ordering providers. Claim denials for billed CTs were retrieved from hospital billing through 9/13/19. Rates of payer denials were analyzed for 5 categories: 1-3 red (not appropriate), 4-6 yellow (may be appropriate), 7-9 green (appropriate), indication not found (option the provider can use if available structured indications are not appropriate), and no score for the provided indication in CDS. Chi-square test was used for statistical significance of denial rate differences. Additionally, reason for payer denial was evaluated to identify any denials attributable to the CT exam’s indication.
Results: During the time period, there were 11,038 billed CTs: 1597 (14.5%) red, 1906 (17.3%) yellow, 5140 (46.6%) green, 1923 (17.4%) indication not found, 472 (4.3%) no score. The payer denied claims in 1,177 (10.7%): 181 (11.3%) red, 200 (10.5%) yellow, 533 (10.4%) green,198 (10.3%) indication not found, and 65 (13.8%) no score. There was no statistically significant rate difference in denials based on CDS category (p = 0.18). Of the red (not indicated) exams, there were no denials attributable to indication. In all, 2 denials were attributed to indication, both on exams with green indications.
Conclusions: At our institution, there was no correlation between CDS appropriateness category and payer denials. Reason for denial of red (not indicated) CT exams was not due to inappropriate indication. At this time, payer criteria is not aligned with appropriateness criteria. In the short term, a change in denial rates for billed CT exams following CDS go-live is not anticipated.
Session Info:

Scientific Session III-C: Healthcare Policy/QI

Informatics, Education, QI, or Healthcare Policy

SPR Scientific Papers

More abstracts on this topic:
Can we ignore tiny nodules in the hepatoblastoma patient? An evaluation of diagnostic criteria for the PRETEXT staging system

Miyazaki Osamu, Oguma Eiji, Nishikawa Masanori, Tanami Yutaka, Kitami Masahiro, Hosokawa Takahiro

Chest Imaging Findings of ANCA-Associated Vasculitides (AAV) in Children

Orman Gunes, Sayad Edouard, Silvacarmona Manuel, Vogel Tiphanie P., Guillerman R

More abstracts from these authors:
Due to circumstances surrounding the coronavirus pandemic, this final ePoster exhibit was not submitted.
You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.

Not Available

Comments

We encourage you to join the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and stimulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

Please click here to review the full terms and conditions for engaging in the discussion, including refraining from product promotion and non-constructive feedback.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)