Main Logo
Logo

Society for Pediatric Radiology – Poster Archive

  139
  0
  0
 
 


Final ID: Poster #: SCI-011

Utility of Applying White Blood Cell Cutoffs to Non-diagnostic MRI and Ultrasound Studies for Suspected Pediatric Appendicitis

Purpose or Case Report: Non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound studies in pediatric patients with suspected appendicitis are often non-diagnostic. The primary objective of this investigation was to determine if combining these non-diagnostic imaging results with white blood cell (WBC) cutoffs improves their negative predictive values. The secondary objective was to determine the test characteristics of the fast, non-contrast MRI protocol used for suspected appendicitis.
Methods & Materials: A retrospective chart review was conducted including patients ≤ 18 years old with suspected appendicitis who had MRI performed with or without a preceding ultrasound study in a pediatric emergency department. Imaging results were sorted into 2 diagnostic and 5 non-diagnostic categories. Negative predictive values were calculated for the non-diagnostic MRI and ultrasound categories with and without combining them with WBC cutoffs of < 10.0 and < 7.5 × 109/L. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios were calculated for the MRI protocol.
Results: Of the 612 patients with MRI studies included, 402 had ultrasound studies performed. MRI with incomplete visualization of a normal appendix without secondary signs of appendicitis had a negative predictive value of 97.9% that changed to 98.1% and 98.2% when combined with WBC cutoffs of < 10.0 and < 7.5, respectively. Ultrasound studies with incomplete visualization of a normal appendix without secondary signs had a negative predictive value of 85.3% that improved to 94.8% and 96.5% when combined with WBC cutoffs of < 10.0 and < 7.5, respectively. The MRI protocol, with equivocal results excluded (7.7% of studies), had a sensitivity of 94.9%, specificity of 99.6%, positive predictive value of 98.2%, negative predictive value of 98.7%, positive likelihood ratio of 212.5, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.05.
Conclusions: In pediatric patients with suspected appendicitis, MRI studies with incomplete visualization of a normal appendix without secondary signs have a high negative predictive value that does not significantly change with the use of these WBC cutoffs. In contrast, combining WBC cutoffs with ultrasound studies with the same interpretation identifies low-risk groups. The fast, non-contrast MRI protocol is limited by a high number of equivocal results, but demonstrated excellent test characteristics for the 92.3% of studies that were evaluable.

This research study has been published in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. Citation: Kennedy TM, Thompson AD, Choudhary AK, Caplan RJ, Schenker KE, DePiero AD. Utility of applying white blood cell cutoffs to non-diagnostic MRI and ultrasound studies for suspected pediatric appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med, 2019 Sep;37(9):1723-1728.
  • Kennedy, Thomas  ( Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children , Wilmington , Delaware , United States )
  • Thompson, Amy  ( Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children , Wilmington , Delaware , United States )
  • Choudhary, Arabinda  ( Department of Radiology, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children , Wilmington , Delaware , United States )
  • Schenker, Kathleen  ( Department of Radiology, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children , Wilmington , Delaware , United States )
  • Depiero, Andrew  ( Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children , Wilmington , Delaware , United States )
Session Info:

Posters - Scientific

GI

SPR Posters - Scientific

Preview
Poster____SCI-011.pdf
You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.

Not Available

Comments

We encourage you to join the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and stimulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

Please click here to review the full terms and conditions for engaging in the discussion, including refraining from product promotion and non-constructive feedback.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)