Main Logo
Logo

Society for Pediatric Radiology – Poster Archive

  216
  0
  0
 
 


Final ID: Poster #: SCI-026

Caution - Shortcomings of Traditional Segmentation Methods from MRI Intended for 3D Surface Modelling in Children with Pathology

Purpose or Case Report: To assess the utility and adaptability of some widely used automated segmentation methods when applied to abnormal pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scans. Segmentation is an essential component of the workflow when building 3D anatomical models of abnormal pediatric brains to demonstrate surface pathology.
Methods & Materials: Institutional review board approval was obtained. 35 abnormal pediatric MRI brain scans were included from a larger population of children with cerebral palsy who received delayed neuroimaging for suspected neonatal hypoxic ischemic injury. They were reviewed by two attending pediatric neuroradiologists and distributed into 4 groups based on pathologic features: 1) Normal; 2) Atrophic; 3) Cavity; 4) Other/ non-cortical. Three automated segmentation tools, all accessible via the Matlab computing environment were used: 1) Computational Anatomy Toolbox version 12 (CAT12); 2) Statistical Parametic Mapping version 12 (SPM12); 3) MRTool. These methods use a combination of tissue probability mapping (TPM) and voxel-based morphometry (VBM) segmentation methods. Segmentation was performed by all 3 modalities on each patient, first with default settings, then with adjusted settings. Successful segmentation was determined by radiologist consensus on the generation of a surface mesh accurately reflecting the source scans that then could be successfully printed.
Results: Initial segmentation with default settings produced 20/35 (57.1%) usable models. Further refinement of various criteria in each modality yielded an increase to successful segmentation in 31/35 (88.6%) models. The cavity group was the most difficult to segment under default settings with overall low initial success rates of CAT12 15.4%, SPM12 23.1%, and MRtool 15.4%. Refined settings and manual edits improved these rates to 23.1%, 69.2%, and 46.2%, respectively.
Conclusions: Segmentation, when using SPM12, CAT12 and MRtool was ineffective as applied to categories of abnormal brain scans demonstrating severe surface pathology - atrophy and especially cavities with thin overlying cortex. Segmentation is a vital component in the workflow when creating 3D anatomical models. The tested methods are not suitable, even with manual augmentation when attempting to segment pediatric brains with severe pathology. Further investigation is required to improve this workflow and create automated segmentation methods that maintain anatomical accuracy when applied to complex surface pathology.
  • Schoeman, Sean  ( The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , United States )
  • Venkatakrishna, Shyam Sunder  ( The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , United States )
  • Chacko, Anith  ( University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences , Bristol , Bristol , United Kingdom )
  • Andronikou, Savvas  ( The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , United States )
Session Info:

Posters - Scientific

Neuroradiology

SPR Posters - Scientific

More abstracts on this topic:
More abstracts from these authors:
Accuracy of Non-Medical and Medical Individuals in Identifying Cerebral Cortical Abnormality from 3D Printed Models of Brain MRI Scans of Children Sustaining Hypoxic Ischemic Brain Injury

Venkatakrishna Shyam Sunder, Chacko Anith, Schoeman Sean, Andronikou Savvas

Using 3D-Printed Liver Models to Teach PRETEXT Staging in Pediatric Radiology

Schoeman Sean, Venkatakrishna Shyam Sunder, Silvestro Elizabeth, Cajigas-loyola Stephanie, Acord Michael

Preview
Poster____SCI-026.pdf
You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.

Not Available

Comments

We encourage you to join the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and stimulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

Please click here to review the full terms and conditions for engaging in the discussion, including refraining from product promotion and non-constructive feedback.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)