Main Logo
Logo

Society for Pediatric Radiology – Poster Archive

  325
  0
  0
 
 


Final ID: Poster #: CR-017

An Educational Case of Meckel's Diverticulum

Purpose or Case Report:
A 3-year-old male presents to the ED with two days of abdominal pain, cramping, anorexia, bilious emesis, RLQ tenderness on exam, and leukocytosis on CBC, refractory to trial of antiemetics, antipyretics, IV fluids, and analgesics. RLQ US and KUB showed an obstructive pattern. MRI demonstrated an inflamed RLQ fluid signal structure, suggesting appendicitis. CT identified a normal appendix and localized a RLQ transition point confirming high-grade SBO. After a trial of bowel rest, a repeat KUB revealed progression. Laparoscopy visualized a RLQ transition point coinciding with a twisted ileum segment due to a Meckel's diverticulum leadpoint. Segmental bowel resection and ileoileal anastomosis was performed. Hemorrhagic necrosis of a true diverticulum was confirmed histologically.
Meckel's is a common congenital GI anomaly, a vestigial structure from the embryologic omphalomesenteric duct. It has a prevalence of 2% and the complication rate is 6%, to include SBO such as in this case. Presentation is typically in the first 2 years of life. Meckel’s are true diverticula which have mucosal, muscularis, and serosal elements, unlike pseudodiverticula. The presence or absence of a muscularis propria layer cannot be determined on imaging alone, yet is evident on histology. Pseudodiverticula, which are more common along the mesenteric side, can originate anywhere in the GI tract.
Meckel's diverticulum has a narrow imaging differential. The appendix is another true diverticula in the right lower quadrant, although Meckel's originates from the distal ileum rather than the cecum. Diverticulosis often presents later with multiple pseudodiverticula in the left hemicolon. Enteric duplication cysts are another, albeit less common, fluid-filled formation located close to the colon. In contradistinction, communication with the intestinal lumen is unusual.
When a single diagnosis cannot be made and surgery is not warranted, a probabilistic presumptive diagnosis is often used in the absence of histology, particularly in cases where management is the same. Asymptomatic Meckel's diverticulum cases don't require treatment. In complicated yet stable patients, expectant management can be employed. If symptoms progress, surgical management may be needed for diagnosis and treatment.
This case highlights the essential role of imaging along with clinical context to differentiate Meckel's diverticulum from similar entities, in order to guide management.
Methods & Materials:
Results:
Conclusions:
  • Rana, Ricky  ( Creighton University , Omaha , Nebraska , United States )
  • Densley, Ashton  ( Creighton University , Omaha , Nebraska , United States )
Session Info:

Posters - Case Report

GI

SPR Posters - Case Reports

More abstracts on this topic:
Meckel's Diverticulum: A Spectrum of Findings on Imaging

Yoon Braian (lucas), Pomeranz Christy

The Role of Functional MR Urography in diagnosing calyceal diverticula

Haroyan Harutyun, Ntoulia Aikaterini, Khrichenko Dmitry, Bellah Richard, Long Christopher, Darge Kassa

Preview
Poster____CR-017.pdf
You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.

Not Available

Comments

We encourage you to join the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and stimulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

Please click here to review the full terms and conditions for engaging in the discussion, including refraining from product promotion and non-constructive feedback.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)