Main Logo
Logo

Society for Pediatric Radiology – Poster Archive

  359
  0
  0
 
 


Final ID: Paper #: 128

Ascent of the conus medullaris level in infants less than 3 months old with borderline or low position of the conus.

Purpose or Case Report: Evaluate temporal change in position of the tip of the conus medullaris in infants with borderline or low position of the conus on initial spine ultrasound (US) performed at less than 3 months of age.
Methods & Materials: This is an IRB-approved study. From the radiology information system, we retrieved all spine US studies from 2004-2018 in children younger than 3 months of age. Based on the radiology report, we included only studies with conus level from L2-L3 to L3-L4 who had follow-up spine US or MRI within one year. All patients with neurological abnormalities related to the lower cord, including lower extremity and bladder dysfunction, or known spinal dysraphism were excluded.

Study indication, age, gender, and time interval between US and follow-up studies were documented. We noted whether the level of the tip of the conus on the initial spine US and follow-up US or MRI study was at the intervertebral level, or at the upper third, middle third, or lower third of a vertebral body level. If this detailed information was not available on the radiology report, it was determined by reviewing the study.
Results: The study group included 72 children (34 females), with age range 0-79 days (average 19 days) at initial spine US. The most common indication for spine US was sacral dimple (34/72, 45.8%). 15 infants had US follow-up and 57 had MRI follow-up. The average follow-up time interval was 118 days.
On the initial US, the tip of the conus was in a borderline position (L2-L3) in 19/72 (25.7%) children and at the upper L3 to L3-L4 level in 53/72 (74.3%). On follow-up, the tip of the conus was normal (at or above L2) in 43/72 (59.7%) children, borderline in position (L2-L3) in 28/72 (37.8%), and at the level of upper L3 in one child.
On average, there was ascent of the tip of the conus by 0.73 vertebral body level over 3.9 months time.
Conclusions: In asymptomatic infants less than 3 months of age, isolated finding of borderline or low conus medullaris (L2-L3 to L3-L4) on spine US may not be a reliable indicator of tethered cord as most will ascend to a normal level in later infancy. Therefore, follow-up imaging of the spine should be considered in selected patients.
Session Info:

Scientific Session V-B: Neuroradiology

Neuroradiology

SPR Scientific Papers

More abstracts on this topic:
Congenital Zika Virus: Unique Neuroimaging Features of this TORCH-like Infection

Wermers Joshua, Fickenscher Kristin, Robinson Amie, Dahl Amy

Characteristics of children with craniosynostosis and the possibility of diagnosing by ultrasound

Djuricic Goran, Medovic Rasa, Dasic Ivana, Pavicevic Polina, Furtula Dubravka, Radovic Tijana

More abstracts from these authors:
Multimodality Diagnosis of Spinal Fractures in Child Abuse

Steinhardt Nicole, Marine Megan, Supakol Nucharin, Radhakrishnan Rupa, Lahiri Niloy, Jennings Greg, Thompson Shannon, Karmazyn Boaz

Should non pediatric radiologists use ultrasound as the primary study for evaluation of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis?

Sassoon Daniel, Wanner Matthew, Marine Megan, Karmazyn Boaz

Preview
Paper____128.pdf
You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.

Not Available

Comments

We encourage you to join the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and stimulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

Please click here to review the full terms and conditions for engaging in the discussion, including refraining from product promotion and non-constructive feedback.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)