Main Logo
Logo

Society for Pediatric Radiology – Poster Archive

  276
  0
  0
 
 


Final ID: Paper #: 005 (S)

Success Rate of Non-sedated MRI in Children 1 to 7 years of Age

Purpose or Case Report: To report the success rate of non-sedate MRI studies in children 1-7 years of age and to evaluate clinical factors predictive of success.
Methods & Materials: This was a HIPAA compliant IRB approved retrospective study. We created a multidisciplinary program to decrease sedation called try-without (TWO) sedation/anesthesia. The approach includes age-appropriate ambient optimization, support from the MRI technologist, child-life (CL) specialist, and protocol optimization by radiologists. In the TWO program, children book two appointments at the time of the scheduling, a) a non-sedated MRI (usually within days of request) and b) a sedated/GA slot (usually days to weeks based on availability). If the TWO exam is successful, the subsequent sedation slot is cancelled; conversely, if the TWO is non-diagnostic, the sedation slot is maintained. Criteria for inclusion were: a) referral for TWO exam between 6/1/2018 and 5/30/2019, b) age 1-7 yrs. For study purposes, success was defined by reviewing the medical record: if the interpretation of the MRI deemed the exam satisfactory for the clinical query. For each case we recorded the age and sex of the child, type of exam (brain, spine, brain and spine, craniofacial, musculoskeletal [MSK], body [abdomen, chest]), intended duration of the protocol, and use of contrast. Descriptive statistics and means of central tendency were used to analyze demographics and clinical data. A multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of success.
Results: We analyzed data from 273 subjects (144 male,129 female) with a mean age of 4.75 years (SD 1.6). The studies were 186 (68.1%) brain, 34 (12.4%) spine, 20 (7.3%) MSK, 15 (5.4%) brain and spine, 10 craniofacial (3.6%), 6 (2.5%) body. The overall success rate was 84.6%. Success rate was 100% for MSK studies, 91% for spine, 83% for brain, 80% for craniofacial, 71% for body, and 53% for combined brain and spine. The logistic regression showed that age had a significant association with success on TWO MRI (p=0.001). Sex, duration of protocol, and use of contrast were not significant predictors of success (p>0.1). All studies performed with contrast (n=30) had successful TWO exams.
Conclusions: A multidisciplinary approach enables high success rate of non-sedated MRI in children 1-7 years of age, exceeding 80%. Success rate significantly increases with age.
  • Jaimes, Camilo  ( Boston Children's Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Mahan, Kellyn  ( Boston Children's Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Machado-rivas, Fedel  ( Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Bixby, Sarah  ( Boston Children's Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Robertson, Richard  ( Boston Children's Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
Session Info:

Scientific Session I-D (SLARP): Trabajos Científicos

Informatics, Education, QI, or Healthcare Policy

SPR Scientific Papers

More abstracts from these authors:
Fetal MRI Troubleshooting: Strategies to Improve Image Quality and Reduce Artifacts

Machado-rivas Fedel, Jaimes Camilo, Kirsch John E, Gee Michael

In vivo Characterization of Emerging White Matter Connectivity in the Fetal Brain in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy

Jaimes Camilo, Machado-rivas Fedel, Velascoanis Clemente, Khan Shadab, Marami Baram, Gholipour Ali

Preview
Paper____005_(S).pdf
You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.

Not Available

Comments

We encourage you to join the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and stimulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

Please click here to review the full terms and conditions for engaging in the discussion, including refraining from product promotion and non-constructive feedback.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)