Main Logo
Logo

Society for Pediatric Radiology – Poster Archive

  338
  0
  0
 
 


Final ID: Paper #: 097

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Appendix Measurements in Children with and without Acute Appendicitis

Purpose or Case Report: Rapid, non-contrast MRI has been reported as accurate for diagnosing acute appendicitis at specialized pediatric hospitals, but there remains a dearth of evidence-based, MRI-specific criteria upon which the diagnosis should be established. To our knowledge, our study comprises the largest study with the most independent readers of MRI-specific diagnostic criteria for pediatric appendicitis reported to date.
Methods & Materials: Our human-factors experimental design included 210 studies from children (4-18 years) with suspected acute appendicitis who underwent rapid, non-contrast MRI following equivocal US exams from January 2014 to December 2017. A positive diagnosis of acute appendicitis was defined as resolution of acute abdominal pain after surgical or medical appendicitis-specific intervention. All exams were graded independently and blinded to clinical data by four fellowship-trained pediatric radiologists with experience ranging from 5-10 years. Complete experimental block design was used to determine the performance characteristics of individual diagnostic criteria. Data were modeled using generalized mixed modeling with SAS/GLIMMIX. The study was powered equally for sensitivity and specificity.
Results: MRI had a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.98. The mean appendix diameter of positive and negative cases was 10.45mm (CI 9.97-10.95) and 5.78mm (CI 5.59-5.99), respectively. The mean appendix wall thickness of positive and negative cases was 2.57mm (CI 2.44-2.71) and 1.69mm (CI 1.54-1.85), respectively. Appendix intraluminal fluid-fluid level had a sensitivity of 0.26 and specificity of 1.00. Peri-appendiceal fluid had a sensitivity of 0.65 and specificity of 0.89. Peri-appendiceal fatty edema had a sensitivity of 0.92 and specificity of 0.97. Presence of appendix wall hyperintensity compared to small bowel wall intensity had a sensitivity of 0.37 and specificity of 1.00.
Conclusions: Appendix diameter wall thickness is a strong quantitative predictor of acute appendicitis with MRI. Presence of peri-appendiceal fatty edema on MRI is also an accurate predictor of acute appendicitis. Other categorical diagnostic criteria including presence of appendix intraluminal fluid-fluid level, peri-appendiceal fluid, and appendiceal fatty edema have high specificity but relatively low sensitivity with MRI. Overall, this study provides valuable information regarding the MRI-specific accuracy of various imaging features associated with pediatric appendicitis.
  • Tung, Eric  ( Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University , Providence , Rhode Island , United States )
  • Ayyala, Rama  ( Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University , Providence , Rhode Island , United States )
  • Sams, Cassandra  ( Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University , Providence , Rhode Island , United States )
  • Herliczek, Thaddeus  ( Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University , Providence , Rhode Island , United States )
  • Baird, Grayson  ( Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University , Providence , Rhode Island , United States )
  • Swenson, David  ( Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University , Providence , Rhode Island , United States )
Session Info:

Scientific Session IV-A: GI/GU

GI

SPR Scientific Papers

More abstracts on this topic:
Can 3T Fetal MRI improve resolution of brain structures?

Priego Gema, Hurteau-miller Julie, Fontalvo Lucia, Miller Elka

Can Pigtail or Narrow Curve Morphology be an Additional Finding Used to Exclude Appendicitis in Questionable Case?

Bedoya Maria, Barrera Christian, Ho-fung Victor, States Lisa

Preview
Paper____097.pdf
You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.

Not Available

Comments

We encourage you to join the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and stimulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

Please click here to review the full terms and conditions for engaging in the discussion, including refraining from product promotion and non-constructive feedback.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)