Main Logo
Logo

Society for Pediatric Radiology – Poster Archive

  273
  0
  0
 
 


Final ID: Paper #: 096

Accuracy of Resident and Attending radiologist interpretations of abdominopelvic magnetic resonance imaging performed for pediatric acute appendicitis

Purpose or Case Report: Acute appendicitis represents an important cause of abdominal pain in pediatric patients. Although imaging plays an increasingly important role in the rapid diagnosis and management of this condition, there is no universally accepted strategy for imaging children suspected of having acute appendicitis. Ultrasound and computed tomography have been used most commonly, but there is rising interest in the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to its lack of ionizing radiation or need for intravenous contrast. Recent research has shown that MRI has high diagnostic performance when employed as a first-line test. However, when considering the generalizability of MRI outside of a specialized tertiary care center, the question of operator dependence arises. To determine the performance of MRI when interpreted by readers with limited experience, we performed a retrospective review of preliminary MRI interpretations rendered by radiology residents at our institution, compared with final (attending radiologist) interpretations.
Methods & Materials: A consecutive series of 377 pediatric patients (age < 19 years) who were imaged using abdominopelvic MRI for acute abdominal pain were included. The preliminary (resident) and final (attending) interpretations of each MRI examination were reviewed and coded as positive or negative for acute appendicitis. Reference standards were derived from the electronic medical record (surgical pathology results and clinical follow-up notes). Concordance (agreement) between preliminary and final reports were determined. Additionally, diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive value) of both residents and attending radiologists were determined by comparing to the reference standards.
Results: The overall concordance rate was high (97.1%) and did not differ significantly with factors such as the PGY level of the resident or the academic year. Analysis of diagnostic performance showed a trend toward lower sensitivity in resident interpretations (91.2% vs. 97.8% for attendings). Specificity was high for both groups (97.6% and 98.9%). Positive predictive value trended lower in residents (92.2% vs. 96.7% for attendings), while negative predictive value was high for both groups (97.2% and 99.3%).
Conclusions: Trainee residents demonstrated strong diagnostic performance in the interpretation of pediatric abdominopelvic MRI, suggesting that the modality may be appropriate for broader implementation outside of specialized tertiary care centers.
Session Info:

Scientific Session IV-A: GI/GU

GI

SPR Scientific Papers

More abstracts on this topic:
OEIS complex with horseshoe kidney

Matos Rojas Irma, Katekaru Tokeshi Doris

An Anatomical Approach to the Pediatric Skull Base: Part 1 Anterior Cranial Fossa

Vijapura Charmi, Dennhardt Joel, Fuortes Michaelangelo, Policeni Bruno, Sato Yutaka, Sato T Shawn

More abstracts from these authors:
Colocolic Intussusception in Children with Colonic Polyp as the Lead Point

Steinmeyer Laura, Desoky Sarah, Gilbertsondahdal Dorothy, Morello Frank, Udayasankar Unni

Pediatric Spinal Ultrasound in Neonates and Young Children: Pearls and Pitfalls

Gupta Kanika, Becker Jennifer, Chandra Tushar, Udayasankar Unni

Preview
Paper____096.pdf
You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.

Not Available

Comments

We encourage you to join the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and stimulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

Please click here to review the full terms and conditions for engaging in the discussion, including refraining from product promotion and non-constructive feedback.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)