Main Logo
Logo

Society for Pediatric Radiology – Poster Archive

  264
  0
  0
 
 


Final ID: Poster #: SCI-014

Assessment of Pediatric Emergency Breast Complaints

Purpose or Case Report: Children and young adults can present with breast complaints in the emergency setting and ultrasound is typically the initial imaging modality of choice for work-up. While many sonographic findings are benign, there are rare presentations of indeterminate and suspicious masses. In these cases, radiologists and clinicians involved in these patient's care may be unfamiliar with the diagnosis and management of lesions that warrant follow-up with dedicated breast imagers. This study is designed to analyze the common characteristics of pediatric breast complaints from the emergency department and if follow-up care was recommended and pursued.
Methods & Materials: This retrospective study reviewed breast US examinations performed on patients 18 years of age and younger from the emergency department at a tertiary pediatric hospital from 1/1/15 to 12/31/19. Imaging findings, follow-up recommendations, and outcomes were obtained from the electronic medical record.
Results: A total of 75 breast US were performed in the emergency setting, with mean patient age of 13 (range 0-18). The most common presenting breast complaint was palpable lump (48% [36/75]), followed by both palpable lump and pain (27% [20/75]), breast pain (17% [13/75]), nipple discharge (5% [4/75]) and breast swelling (3% [2/75]). A benign correlate (ie glandular tissue, etc) occurred in 24% [18/75] of cases. An infectious etiology (ie abscess, etc) occurred in 45% [34/75] of cases. Benign-appearing mass occurred in 12% [9/75] of cases. A mass without benign sonographic features occurred in 7% [5/75] of cases. Of these suspicious masses, 40% (2/5) underwent biopsy with 1 revealing malignant spindle cell tumor in a patient presenting with a palpable lump. Of all sonographic masses, 71% (10/14) were given US follow-up recommendation for further evaluation with the breast clinic, of which 50% (5/10) of patients were lost to follow-up.
Conclusions: Careful evaluation sonographic findings of pediatric patients presenting with breast complaints in the emergency setting is recommended. While pediatic breast masses are rare, especially malignancies, identification of imaging features of suspicious breast lesions and effective communication of follow-up recommendations with dedicated breast imagers are essential. Emphasizing follow-up with the breast clinic at discharge for pediatric patients presenting with any mass in the emergency setting may be required to reduce the number of patients lost to follow-up and prevent missed breast cancer diagnoses.
  • Nguyen, Derek  ( Johns Hopkins Medicine , Baltimore , Maryland , United States )
  • Dunn, Emily  ( Johns Hopkins Medicine , Baltimore , Maryland , United States )
Session Info:

Posters - Scientific

Thoracic Imaging

SPR Posters - Scientific

More abstracts on this topic:
Mommy, My Tummy Hurts: Ultrasound Diagnosis of Pediatric Gastrointestinal Emergencies - A Simulation Study

Sharma Priya, Rajderkar Dhanashree, Schaiberger Gregory, Batmunh Bayar, Slater Roberta, Mancuso Anthony

Characteristics of children with craniosynostosis and the possibility of diagnosing by ultrasound

Djuricic Goran, Medovic Rasa, Dasic Ivana, Pavicevic Polina, Furtula Dubravka, Radovic Tijana

More abstracts from these authors:
Emergency Pediatric Breast Complaints: A Pictorial Review.

Nguyen Derek, Dunn Emily

Pediatric Chest Ultrasound-beyond Pleural Effusion-pictorial Review

Machnitz Judit, Son Jennifer, Dunn Emily, Bokhari Danial, Spevak Melissa, Tekes-brady Aylin

Preview
Poster____SCI-014.pdf
You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.

Not Available

Comments

We encourage you to join the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and stimulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

Please click here to review the full terms and conditions for engaging in the discussion, including refraining from product promotion and non-constructive feedback.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)