Main Logo
Logo

Society for Pediatric Radiology – Poster Archive

  304
  0
  0
 
 


Final ID: Paper #: 125

Lumps and Bumps of the Head and Neck in Children: a 5-year Retrospective Review, and Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation

Purpose or Case Report: Identify the most common diagnoses of superficial head and neck lesions in children under 4 years of age, and correlate imaging and pathologic findings.
Methods & Materials: A HIPPA compliant, IRB approved, 5-year retrospective review was performed at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. Patients up to 4 years of age, with head and neck sonogram (US), and imaging indication that included “lump”, “bump”, or “mass” were included, with or without imaging follow up with US, radiography (XR), computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance (MR) within next 180 days. EMR, radiology reports, and pathology reports were reviewed. Patients with no palpable lump, known malignancy, lost to follow-up, or unavailable imaging information were excluded.

Imaging diagnoses were categorized as; N: negative, AS: anatomic structure, C: cystic, S: solid, O: other. Pathology reports were classified as; I: inflammatory/infectious, neoplasm (BN: benign, MN: malignant), CL: congenital, NOS: nonspecific. Percentage of most common imaging and pathologic diagnoses were calculated and tabulated. A Radiologic-pathologic correlation for the most common benign and malignant lesions was performed.
Results: A total of 915 patients of 0-4 years (mean: 1.4y; 50% M, 50% F), with head and neck US, from 5/2014 to 5/2019 were evaluated. 75.7% (693) had a single US, and 24.2% (222) had follow up imaging within 6 months (US:126, XR:7, CT:41, MR:47, PET/CT:1). Lesion diagnosis was 77% (710) by imaging (91% US, 4.3% US/MR, 3% US/CT, 0.7% US/XR) of likely benign lesions (S: 44%, C: 27% AS: 14%, O: 2.5%. N: 10%). 22% (205) of lesions had pathologic confirmation, BN: 51% ([105] C: 82%, S: 16%, O: 2%), CL: 27% ([56] C: 84%, S: 7%, O: 4%, N: 6%), I: 18% ([38] S:55%, C: 42%, O: 3%), MN: 2.4% ([5] S:100%), NOS: 0.5% ([1] C: 100%).

Of 693 patients with single US, 18% (128) were excised and benign. Of 222 lesions with additional imaging, 34% (77) were excised. Only 1 malignant and 15 benign lesions had incorrect imaging diagnosis. Common imaging diagnoses were solid (lymph nodes, infantile hemangioma, fibromatosis colli). Common pathologies were cystic and solid (dermoid cyst, thyroglossal duct cyst, lymphadenitis). Malignant lesions were uncommon, >3cm, solid, and heterogeneous.
Conclusions: Ultrasonography is highly accurate for evaluation of head and neck lesions in infants and young children. Benign lesions are common, cystic and solid. Malignant lesions are uncommon, larger, solid, heterogeneous, and require further imaging evaluation.
  • Murcia, Diana  ( Boston Children's Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Myers, Ross  ( Boston Children's Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Estroff, Judy  ( Boston Children's Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Callahan, Michael  ( Boston Children's Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
Session Info:

Scientific Session V-A: Fetal/Neonatal

Fetal Imaging / Neonatal

SPR Scientific Papers

More abstracts on this topic:
Assessment of Germinal Matrix Hemorrhage on Cranial Ultrasound with Deep Learning Algorithms

Kim Kevin, Nowrangi Rajeev, Mcgehee Arianna, Joshi Neil, Acharya Patricia

Contrast-Enhanced Brain Ultrasound Perfusion Parameters in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia in the EXTra-uterine Environment for Neonatal Development

Didier Ryne, Martin-saavedra Juan, Sridharan Anush, Larson Abby, Coons Barbara, Coleman Beverly, Davey Marcus, Hedrick Holly, Flake Alan

Preview
Paper____125.pdf
You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.

Not Available

Comments

We encourage you to join the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and stimulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

Please click here to review the full terms and conditions for engaging in the discussion, including refraining from product promotion and non-constructive feedback.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)