Main Logo
Logo

Society for Pediatric Radiology – Poster Archive

  309
  0
  0
 
 


Final ID: Paper #: 161

Quantitative Evaluation of the Brain Echogenicity in Hypoxic-ischemic Encephalopathy Compared with Controls

Purpose or Case Report: Ultrasound (US) is a powerful imaging tool in the evaluation of neonates with suspected hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). US evaluation of the neonatal brain has been mainly performed qualitatively, comparing intracranial structures with different echotextures. Qualitative US analysis of the neonatal HIE brain may vary according to technical variations, the severity of the injury and the presence of coexistent complications. Quantitative analysis of the neonatal brain echotexture has been seldom attempted. Our aim was to compare the echotextures of specific brain regions between HIE patients and controls.
Methods & Materials: Brain ultrasound of twenty term neonates with HIE with abnormal MRI findings and twenty term neonates with no clinical or MRI evidence of HIE were retrospectively evaluated. US imaging obtained in the coronal plane with slow anterior to posterior swipe technique was post-processed by an in-house parametric software. The six brain regions evaluated were the anterior, intermediate and posterior white matter (WM), the basal ganglia (BG), thalami and the perirolandic subcortical WM. One circular region of interest (ROI) was placed in each given brain region in both hemispheres. The sum of pixels of the two ROIs ranged between 2000 and 2050 pixels. The echotexture measurements were normalized to the echotexture of the choroid plexus (CP) in each given individual. The CP in the atria of the lateral ventricle (CP glomus) was chosen for normalization with circular ROIs. The number of ROIs of the CP also ranged from 2000 to 2050 pixels. Permutation test was used to compare differences in means between HIE patients and normal controls.
Results: The normalized echotexture of the brain regions in HIE patients vs control individuals were: anterior WM (0.76 vs 0.59, p<0.001), intermediate WM (0.75 vs 0.60, p=0.02), posterior WM (0.68 vs 0.54, p<0.001), BG (0.65 vs 0.53, p=0.006), thalami (0.78, vs 0.61 p<0.001) and perirolandic subcortical WM (0.77 vs 0.54, p<0.001).
Conclusions: Quantification of brain echotexture is a feasible method to differentiate HIE from control neonates in cases equivocal for qualitative diagnosis. Further work can also reveal whether a quantitative approach can also discern varying types and severity of HIE.
  • Goncalves, Fabricio  ( CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , United States )
  • Khrichenko, Dmitry  ( CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , United States )
  • Zheng, Qiang  ( Yantai University, School of Computer and Control Engineering , Yantai , China )
  • Hwang, Misun  ( CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , United States )
Session Info:

Scientific Session VI-B: Neuroradiology

Neuroradiology

SPR Scientific Papers

More abstracts on this topic:
Ascent of the conus medullaris level in infants less than 3 months old with borderline or low position of the conus.

Osman Radya, Karmazyn Boaz, Marine Megan, Wanner Matthew, Radhakrishnan Rupa, Supakul Nucharin, Ducis Katrina, Jennings Samuel, Jea Andrew

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of Liver Lesions in Children: A Comparative Study to CT/MRI

Iles Benjamin, Rubesova Erika, Neumann Brittney, Barth Richard

More abstracts from these authors:
Due to circumstances surrounding the coronavirus pandemic, this final ePoster exhibit was not submitted.
You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.

Not Available

Comments

We encourage you to join the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and stimulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

Please click here to review the full terms and conditions for engaging in the discussion, including refraining from product promotion and non-constructive feedback.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)