Main Logo
Logo

Society for Pediatric Radiology – Poster Archive

  2
  0
  0
 
 


Final ID: Poster #: SCI-029

Pilot Study of Classic Metaphyseal Lesion Rates in Infants With a History of Prematurity

Purpose or Case Report: Premature infants are at an increased risk of physical abuse. However, the rate of classic metaphysical lesions (CMLs) in premature infants is currently unknown. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to compare the rates of CMLs in premature infants relative to term infants.
Methods & Materials: Using the radiology information system, a one year (2003) retrospective study is being conducted using initial radiographic skeletal surveys performed in children under two years old at Riley Hospital for Children. Of the 657 infants that had skeletal surveys, preliminary analysis was performed on 100 patients (performed in reverse chronological order). Clinical information was obtained from the radiology reports and the electronic medical record. The proportion of clinically diagnosed abuse and the proportion of fractures and CMLs between groups were compared using Fisher's exact tests.
Results: Of the 100 patients, 34 had no documented birth history. Of the remaining 66 patients, 17 had a history of prematurity. The mean gestational age at birth in these premature infants was 34 weeks, 5 days (with a range of 27 weeks, 6 days to 36 weeks, 6 days).

29.4% (5/17) of premature infants were clinically diagnosed with nonaccidental trauma, whereas 35.3% (6/17) had an indeterminate clinical diagnosis. On the other hand, 51.0% (25/49) of term infants were clinically diagnosed with nonaccidental trauma, whereas 14.3% (7/49) had an indeterminate clinical diagnosis. There was no difference in the proportion of abuse between these groups (p=0.12).

Premature infants had fractures on 35.3% (6/17) of skeletal surveys with CMLs present on 5.9% (1/17), whereas term infants had fractures present on 32.7% (16/49) of skeletal surveys with CMLs present on 8.1% (4/49).There was no difference in the proportion of fractures in general (p=1.0) or CMLs specifically (p=1.0) between these groups. No CMLs were present in patients with accidental injuries or with an indeterminate diagnosis.
Conclusions: These pilot data indicate that premature infants may not exhibit higher rates of fractures or CMLs. Given the current limitations (small sample size and no difference in the rate of clinically diagnosed abuse), though, the larger study incorporating the stage of prematurity and corrected gestational age will be needed to validate these findings (and the updated results will be presented). Future studies will incorporate followup skeletal surveys and examine the specificity of CMLs in premature infants.
  • Okonjo, Ethel  ( Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health , Indianapolis , Indiana , United States )
  • Oshodi, Connell  ( Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health , Indianapolis , Indiana , United States )
  • Marine, Megan  ( Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health , Indianapolis , Indiana , United States )
  • Karmazyn, Boaz  ( Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health , Indianapolis , Indiana , United States )
  • Newman, Christopher  ( Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health , Indianapolis , Indiana , United States )
Meeting Info:
Session Info:

Posters - Scientific

Musculoskeletal

SPR Posters - Scientific

More abstracts from these authors:
Prenatal Hydrocolpos: Imaging Findings and Differential Diagnoses

Newman Christopher, Forbes-amrhein Monica, Brown Brandon, Marine Megan

The Unique Patterns of Classic Metaphyseal Lesion Healing

Shields Jared, Marine Megan, Karmazyn Boaz

Preview
Poster____SCI-029.pdf
You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.

Not Available

Comments

We encourage you to join the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and stimulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

Please click here to review the full terms and conditions for engaging in the discussion, including refraining from product promotion and non-constructive feedback.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)