Main Logo
Logo

Society for Pediatric Radiology – Poster Archive

  409
  0
  0
 
 


Final ID: Poster #: SCI-027

Fluoroscopic practice patterns during pregnancy in Pediatric Radiologists

Purpose or Case Report: To describe the fluoroscopic practice patterns during pregnancy in pediatric radiologists and potential impact on professional relationships and career.
Methods & Materials: An anonymous online survey was sent to SPR members via email.
Results: Of 398 responses (65% female, 35% male), most females (78%) reported being pregnant while practicing radiology. The majority (72%) announced their pregnancy during the first trimester. Factors affecting the timing and decision to announce pregnancy included fear of miscarriage (43%), impact of co-workers having to perform extra work during maternity leave (42%), impact of co-workers having to perform extra fluoroscopy during pregnancy (32%), negative reaction from co-workers (22%), and fear of negative impact on career (21%).

The majority (85%) performed fluoroscopy during pregnancy. Forty percent felt they had a choice whether to perform fluoroscopy; 28% said it depended on the pregnancy; and 32% felt they had no choice. Most performed fluoroscopy during all 3 trimesters (1st 78%, 2nd 90%, 3rd 87%). The majority (81%) double leaded; 45% asked a coworker to cover fluoroscopy; 38% observed trainees performing fluoroscopy; 37% used a lead shield. Forty-six percent felt their fluoroscopic responsibilities during pregnancy were stressful. Physical demands included lead aprons being too heavy (42%) or not fitting (29%), and back pain (38%), and 26% described no extra physical demands.

Of all male and female survey respondents, 56% have had to cover fluoroscopy for a pregnant co-worker; a majority (76%) did not consider this burdensome. Twenty percent of women who opted to perform less fluoroscopy felt it negatively impacted their professional relationships and/or career. After witnessing a pregnant co-worker perform less fluoroscopy,16% of female and 0.04% of male respondents observed a subsequent negative impact on her professional relationships and/or career.
Conclusions: The majority of responding SPR female members have performed fluoroscopy during pregnancy. Of the respondents who performed less fluoroscopy during pregnancy, twenty percent reported a negative impact on their professional relationships and/or career. Interestingly, even fewer respondents reported witnessing a negative impact on a co-worker with significant differences in male and female responses. The negative impact of avoiding fluoroscopy during pregnancy is either under-discussed or over-estimated by pregnant radiologists.
  • Kim, Jane  ( University of Maryland Medical Center , Baltimore , Maryland , United States )
  • Son, Jennifer  ( University of Maryland Medical Center , Baltimore , Maryland , United States )
  • Poletto, Erica  ( St. Christopher's Hospital for Children , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , United States )
  • Phelps, Andrew  ( UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital , San Francisco , California , United States )
  • Levin, Terry  ( Montefiore Medical Center , Bronx , New York , United States )
Session Info:

Posters - Scientific

Informatics, Education, QI, or Healthcare Policy

SPR Posters - Scientific

More abstracts on this topic:
Developing Technical Expertise in Pediatric Fluoroscopy—A 3D Printing Simulation Based Curriculum

Veselis Clinton, Venkatakrishna Shyam Sunder, Silvestro Elizabeth, Bennett Brittany, Srinivasan Abhay, Acord Michael, Sze Raymond, Reid Janet, Anupindi Sudha

Clinical Uses of Fluoroscopic Voiding Cystourethrograms in Pediatric Radiology

Mccauley Robert, Sinha Vikash, Pierre Kevin, Morgan Amber, Yekeler Ensar, Rodero Cardoso Mariana, Sharma Priya

More abstracts from these authors:
Preview
Poster____SCI-027.pdf
You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login or Signup.

Please note that this is a separate login, not connected with your credentials used for the SPR main website.

Not Available